Types of reliability in research methods

The correlation between these ratings would give you an estimate of the reliability or consistency between the raters. Of course the problem with test-retest is that people may have learned and that the second test is likely to give different results.

What is Reliability?

Some examples of the methods to estimate reliability include test-retest reliabilityinternal consistency reliability, and parallel-test reliability. Relating Reliability and Validity Reliability is directly related to the validity of the measure.

There are several ways of splitting a test to estimate reliability. A week and a month later, they are given the same tests. Get students involved; have the students look over the assessment for troublesome wording, or other difficulties.

Types of Reliability

Saul McLeodpublished The term reliability in psychological research refers to the consistency of a research study or measuring test. However, formal psychometric analysis, called item analysis, is considered the most effective way to increase reliability.

Reliability (statistics)

Does the instrument consistently measure what it is intended to measure? The questions are written with complicated wording and phrasing. Same people, different times. There, it measures the extent to which all parts of the test contribute equally to what is being measured.

You probably should establish inter-rater reliability outside of the context of the measurement in your study. Examples Various questions for a personality test are tried out with a class of students over several years.

You might use the inter-rater approach especially if you were interested in using a team of raters and you wanted to establish that they yielded consistent results.

With allowances for learning, the variation in the test and retest results are used to assess which tests have better test-retest reliability.

Types of reliability

The figure shows the six item-to-total correlations at the bottom of the correlation matrix. When designing an assessment of learning in the theatre department, it would not be sufficient to only cover issues related to acting.

Inter-Rater Reliability When multiple people are giving assessments of some kind or are the subjects of some test, then similar people should lead to the same resulting scores. Where observer scores do not significantly correlate then reliability can be improved by: Assessing Reliability Split-half method The split-half method assesses the internal consistency of a test, such as psychometric tests and questionnaires.

The higher the correlation between the established measure and new measure, the more faith stakeholders can have in the new assessment tool. Students are asked to keep self-checklists of their after school activities, but the directions are complicated and the item descriptions confusing problem with interpretation.

Therefore the split-half method was not be an appropriate method to assess reliability for this personality test. Test-Retest Reliability Used to assess the consistency of a measure from one time to another. The parallel forms estimator is typically only used in situations where you intend to use the two forms as alternate measures of the same thing.Research Methods in Psychology.

Chapter 5: Psychological Measurement. Reliability and Validity of Measurement Learning Objectives. Define reliability, including the different types and how they are assessed.

Define validity, including the different types and how they are assessed. Experimental Research Methods. The first method is the straightforward experiment, involving the standard practice of manipulating quantitative, independent variables to generate statistically analyzable data.


Generally, the system of scientific measurements is interval or ratio based. When we talk about ‘scientific research methods’, this is what.

Types of Reliability At Research Methods Knowledge Base, they review four different types of reliability. However, inter-rater reliability is not generally a part of survey research, as this refers to the ability of two human raters/observers to correctly provide a quantitate score for a given phenomenon.

Types. There are several general classes of reliability estimates: Inter-rater reliability assesses the degree of agreement between two or more raters in their appraisals.; Test-retest reliability assesses the degree to which test scores are consistent from one test administration to the next.

Measurements are gathered from a single rater who uses the same methods. Validity encompasses the entire experimental concept and establishes whether the results obtained meet all of the requirements of the scientific research method.

For example, there must have been randomization of the sample groups and appropriate care and diligence shown in the allocation of controls. Establishing validity and reliability in qualitative research can be less precise, though participant/member checks, peer evaluation (another researcher checks the researcher’s inferences based on the instrument (Denzin & Lincoln, ), and multiple methods (keyword: triangulation), are convincingly used.

Instrument, Validity, Reliability

Some qualitative researchers reject.

Types of reliability in research methods
Rated 3/5 based on 33 review