But a complete ban of smoking in public is unecessary. Smoking causes alot of problems not only for the smoker, but for the people around. The number of states that enacted statewide comprehensive smoke-free policies i.
Of course, we can smoke if this will affect no one. I mean, those public places can save up some money so they can build special areas for non-smokers and those areas would be vent. Furthermore, non-smokers choose to put up with many other types of pollutants when they go outside.
We often see people very drunk in public spaces. International Agency for Research on Cancer; If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option. But where exactly does that line of thinking end? CDC considers a state smoke-free law to be comprehensive if it prohibits smoking in these three venues.
In many cities, carbon monoxide from car emissions is the far more prevalent — and similarly toxic — air pollutant, yet nobody has proposed a blanket ban on cars.
Banning smoking in public areas means limiting individual liberties. Secondly, banning smoking is actually a financial loss for the government, as it collects a lot of revenue through the taxes on cigarette sales.
Your vote is anonymous. Most people beleive that someone who is not in the smoking area of the public place will not be affected by the smoke, but smoke is able to spread in a room and affect the people around.
But a complete ban is not necessary. However, smokers should not be treated unfairly. Actors, politicians, parents and other figures we admired used to smoke. Firstly, smoking gets a fire easily. The Healthy People target of enacting smoke-free indoor air laws that prohibit smoking in public places and worksites in all 50 states and DC can be achieved if such laws continue to be adopted at the current pace, and activities are intensified in southern states.
Its also very unhealthy. More articles to read: The Surgeon General has concluded that the only way to fully protect nonsmokers from SHS exposure is to prohibit smoking in all indoor areas, and that separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning the air, and ventilating buildings cannot eliminate SHS exposure 1.
The second is that cigarette butts are a form of litter.
Many people, including a sizeable number of non-smokers, are opposed to the idea of banning outdoor smoking on philosophical grounds. The most productive and compassionate approach to the public health issue of smoking is to treat smokers as addicts rather than willful nuisances.
It is bad enough that smokers get to go outside every 30 minutes to smoke for minutes while non smokers have to work work work work all day without those breaks. N Engl J Med ; This lack of scientific proof is cited by opponents who argue that outdoor smoking bans are more about stigmatizing and banishing smokers in a punitive manner than protecting public health.
Since tobacco use is largely perceived to be a bad habit that squanders money and lives, should smoking be banned in public places?
Thus, in this condition and under stress, they might pose a problem to others.
Whether the smoker is using public transport or is in a restaurant, the people around him are bound to inhale the smoke coming out of his cigarette, thus making them prone to all the diseases an active smoker gets.
To assess progress toward meeting this objective, CDC reviewed state laws restricting smoking in effect as of December 31, Humans are often willing to undertake some risks for their health for the sake of enjoyment.
At their worst, outdoor bans increase the alienation smokers feel without helping them gain any control over their addictions. If smokers cannot smoke cigarretes in public spaces they will likely smoke less.Winter Moon, your Question is difficult to answer because it makes a clearly incorrect assumption.
I would certainly not agree that cigarettes must be banned in all public places (which would include beaches, parks, sidewalks, and the middle of th. Sep 29, · It’s time: Snuff out public smoking suggest the nasty habit should be banned in public places, where non smokers cannot escape the noxious fumes.
Because. Apr 07, · Smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes in public places should be banned because it’s offensive to the non-smokers who have to endure the smoke, the butts, the mess and the smell. Consider the typical public place – a market door entrance, a park bench, an mint-body.comon: N Cave Creek Rd, Phoenix, Jun 27, · Report: Ban smoking in public places “Nonsmokers need protection through the restriction of smoking in public places and workplaces” — and by smokers voluntarily not puffing around.
Smoking, in the United States, is ruled entirely by individual state laws, as the United States Congress has not yet enacted any nationwide federal ban. The following article debates on whether smoking should be banned in public places or not.
Follow Us: One of the facts is that smoking in public spaces influences non-smokers. Find out if smoking in public places, including outdoor areas, should be banned. On the one side people claim that smokes bothers non-smokers, even if it is outdoors. Should smoking be banned in public places, even in outdoor areas?
Vote and explain your views.Download