In other words, such an ethic is precisely what we need in order to have a rational basis for avoiding judgmentalism or censoriousness. In our revulsion against hypocrisy and false morality we have abandoned morality itself. And if the desirability of a certain kind of reputation is about more than what people happen to want for themselves, we might plausibly hold that a bad, true reputation is in fact worse than a bad, false one.
Fleshing this out a little, consider first the way in which moral judgment about others is manifested in outward behaviour. The discipline has many specialized fields, such as engineering ethicsbioethicsgeoethicspublic service ethics and business ethics.
And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand. Through a thought experiment, Rawls developed a way of getting people to come up with universal principles of justice.
As we grow up, we are responsible to make the right choices with the good conscience we were born with. Here the comparison is difficult, since there are considerations for and against the relative desirability of both. Secondly, it might be objected that we cannot know with certainty the judgments that people make, mental contents being notoriously elusive, so we risk doing ourselves what we might end up imputing to others—making wrongful moral judgments about third parties.
True, I would rather lose my good name than my leg; you would probably rather be deprived of your fine reputation than your spouse, your house and all your savings. Are moral theories descriptive or prescriptive?
Why might that be? Commit your way to the Lord; trust in him, and he will act. Furthermore, it is likely that people who have a particular character flaw are more prone than those without it to find the same flaw in others. Every single person born has this innate knowledge automatically within himself — a clear standard by which he can judge himself.
All we need to know is that most people are good, and that therefore in any particular case we are bound both rationally and morally to presume that the person under our consideration is good.
If people think you are bad, they are generally not going to treat you well—not in the sense of going out of their way to hurt you, but they are likely to avoid association with you, distrust you, not give you the benefit of the doubt, and so on.
Yet the pity stems from the psychic damage they inflict on themselves, and no one thinks a person is morally entitled to harm themselves by indulging in such states of mind except insofar as we all agree that a person cannot be coerced into this or that mental state.
By contrast, much as it probably galls many people to hear it, it would be unjust to damage the reputation of a celebrity who manipulates the media and deceives the public to preserve an unmerited good name.
Role ethics Role ethics is an ethical theory based on family roles. But the people of Israel were fruitful and increased greatly; they multiplied and grew exceedingly strong, so that the land was filled with them. Hence reputations can also be bad. If a highly reliable witness tells me, without any doubt in her mind, that some bare acquaintance of mine has been stealing from his employer, may I judge that this is so?
Instead, its silence is implied as support of evil. It seems I cannot unless I can also sell the identity that goes with it, because a good name is essentially that of a specific individual.
The same applies to any individual who has experienced a series of disappointments in life. The legal presumption was a product of the fusion of Roman and canon law in the early Middle Ages, and these were founded on what all jurists recognized as the natural law — universal moral prescriptions that mandated, among other things, how a person accused of some crime was to be treated.
Another would be where we have a special position of authority to make such an inquiry. In these sorts of cases, the issue is always one of either potentially helping by correction, admonition, punishment the person into whose state of character one is inquiring, or else protecting against potential injustice to oneself or third parties.
The government should warn people about individuals of bad character where the common welfare is at stake dangerous criminals on the loose, rogue traders, etc. We only devise simple non-compound terms for things that are either objectively uncommon relative to the rest of what exists, or are at least uncommon relative to our everyday experience of the world.
But neither you nor I are in a position that requires us to correct Delia by blackening her name, and if there is no manifest danger of a significant injustice to specific others it is hard to be more precise but we must remember that, as Aristotle insisted, ethics is not mathematicshow can we justify taking away from her a possession, namely her reputation, that is more valuable than money or other wealth?
Similarly, the possessor of a good, true name has quite a bit of control over their reputation, but it is nowhere near complete: This does not negate one of the prime moral principles—do no wrong —but it does indicate the need for caution and context.
Only special pleading could make for a difference. Must we always ignore good consequences? Suggest a Verse Enter a Verse Reference e. A right to a good name?Now right and wrong are matters for debate. The end of the Second World War was a turning point. And while the morality of the ’30s was not perfect, Cleeve noted that “to exchange a false morality for no morality at all is not necessarily an.
Right & Wrong Who Decides? Posted on Mar 25, by Roger Any effective judgment about what is right or wrong needs to thoroughly balance the long-term value and consequences of our actions against their value in satisfying our short-term needs, pleasures and desires.
The authors of all the books of the Bible wrote that. Why is judgement bad? Update Cancel. Answer Wiki. 6 Answers. I am struggling with this issue right now. We need to judge to live life. you tacitly are saying to yourself that anything not late Spring is wrong or bad.
This is what judgement does. Non judgement has no walls, no final decisions, everything just “is”. The Morality of Reputation and the Judgment of Others. David S. Oderberg. Department of Philosophy, University of Reading means that in all but a relatively narrow range of cases it is always wrong to think badly of someone, even if they are bad.
whether they deserve that reputation or not. As we value the right to property, so we. Choose the Right Synonym for judgment. sense, common sense, common sense tells me it's wrong judgment implies sense tempered and refined by experience, training, and maturity.
an opinion or decision that is based on careful thought. It is the instinctive knowledge of right and wrong.1 Like a candle, its light shines to expose the darkness. It keeps a perfect record of every .Download